Do-Gooders: How Liberals Hurt Those They Claim to Help (and the Rest ofUs) : Book Review

In "Do-Gooders" by Mona Charen, the author delves into the unintended repercussions of well-meaning policies and actions by liberals. Charen presents a thought-provoking examination of how the desire to "do good" can often lead to harmful and counterproductive outcomes, particularly in the areas of education, poverty, and foreign aid. By challenging commonly held liberal beliefs, Charen provides a compelling critique of their approach to solving social problems.

A key focus of Charen's book is the impact of liberal education policies. She argues that an intense push for equality in education has inadvertently resulted in declining standards and an overemphasis on boosting self-esteem rather than encouraging genuine academic achievement. Charen provides evidence to support her claims, shedding light on the negative consequences of policies such as the elimination of tracking and the excessive promotion of multiculturalism.

Charen also scrutinizes the liberal approach to poverty and welfare. She contends that the heavy emphasis on redistributing wealth and relying on government assistance often ends up trapping individuals in a perpetual cycle of dependency instead of empowering them to escape poverty. Charen challenges the notion that government programs alone can effectively address poverty, offering alternative ideas and solutions for tackling the issue more effectively.

Furthermore, Charen shines a critical light on liberal foreign aid policies. She argues that well-intentioned efforts to alleviate poverty in developing countries can inadvertently perpetuate corruption and hinder economic growth. Charen urges for a more cautious and discerning approach to foreign aid, one that takes into account the intricate complexities of each specific situation.

By and large, "Do-Gooders" invites readers to reflect upon the consequences of well-intentioned actions and provides a compelling argument against the notion that good intentions alone are enough to solve complex social problems. Charen's book challenges readers to reevaluate their perceptions and seek more effective and sustainable solutions to the issues at hand. It serves as a stimulating critique of liberal policies and encourages a more thoughtful and pragmatic approach to solving societal challenges.

What are readers saying?

Mona Charen's book "Do-Gooders: How Liberals Hurt Those They Claim to Help (and the Rest of Us)" has received a mix of reviews. The average rating of 3.69 out of 5 stars reflects diverse opinions on Charen's exploration of the negative impact of well-intentioned liberals and their policies.

Many reviewers appreciated Charen's thought-provoking analysis of liberal policies and their unintended consequences. They found her arguments well-researched and supported by evidence, providing insight into the unintended harm caused by certain well-meaning initiatives. The book is seen as a wake-up call, urging readers to critically assess the potential negative outcomes of seemingly positive actions.

However, some readers felt that Charen's arguments were one-sided and lacked objectivity. They believed she focused primarily on criticizing liberals while overlooking potential flaws in conservative policies. Despite acknowledging the importance of debating liberal ideologies, they felt that a more balanced perspective would have made the book more impactful.

Several reviewers praised Charen's clear writing style, which made complex political ideas accessible to a wide range of readers. They found the book informative and engaging, offering unique insights into the repercussions of social engineering. Charen's clarity and coherence in conveying her ideas garnered appreciation from many.

On the other hand, some readers expressed disappointment with what they perceived as a lack of depth in Charen's arguments. They felt the book relied heavily on anecdotes and cherry-picked examples to support her claims. These reviewers believed that a more comprehensive examination of various policies and their consequences would have strengthened her arguments.

DoGoodersBook InspiringReads MakeADifference