In Giovanni Sartori's "Homo Videns: Television and Post-democracy," readers are presented with a stimulating analysis of the profound effects television has had on society. Sartori posits that the rise of the visual medium has dramatically altered our political landscape and contributed to the decline of democracy. This book offers a compelling argument that challenges our preconceptions about the power of television and its impact on our ability to engage in meaningful political discourse.

Sartori delves into how the dominance of television has shifted our attention from the written word to the image. He argues that this visual culture has spawned a new form of political communication in which citizens have become passive spectators rather than active participants in the democratic process. Supported by extensive research and historical examples, Sartori illustrates how television has diminished our capacity for critical thinking and reduced politics to mere entertainment.

One of the book's strengths lies in Sartori's ability to dissect how television shapes public opinion. He sheds light on the medium's emphasis on image and emotion, which often eclipses substance and rationality, enabling the manipulation of mass consciousness. This challenges the notion that television is a neutral tool and reveals the hidden power dynamics at play.

Available on Audible

Get as a free audio book
Exploring the era of visual culture and its impact on society

Beyond analyzing the impact of television, Sartori also offers insight into the broader implications of living in a post-democratic society. He contends that the erosion of political participation and the rise of populism are direct consequences of the transition from a word-based to an image-based society. By exploring these themes, Sartori provides readers with a comprehensive understanding of the far-reaching consequences of the visual medium.

In conclusion, "Homo Videns: Television and Post-democracy" is a compelling and thought-provoking book that reevaluates our understanding of television's role in shaping society. Giovanni Sartori's analysis offers valuable insights into the impact of the visual medium on democracy and prompts readers to reflect on the potential implications of living in a post-democratic society.

What are readers saying?

Giovanni Sartori's book "Homo Videns: Televisione e post-pensiero" has received a range of reviews, expressing differing opinions on its content. The book explores the influence of television on society and how it has shaped our thinking patterns. Here is a summary of the reviews:

1. Positive Reviews: Some readers praised Sartori for his insightful analysis of television's impact on the human mind. They found the book thought-provoking and appreciated his ability to delve into the deeper implications of media consumption. These reviewers commended Sartori's clear writing style and his aptitude for making complex concepts accessible to a wider audience.

2. Critiques of the Writing Style: Several reviewers found Sartori's writing style to be overly academic and dense. They felt that the book was difficult to read and understand due to its heavy use of technical language and convoluted arguments. These readers struggled to engage with the content and were frustrated by the lack of clarity in the author's explanations.

3. Thought-Provoking Analysis: Many readers appreciated the book's central thesis: that television has played a significant role in shaping society and thinking patterns. They found Sartori's examination of the media landscape relevant and eye-opening. These reviewers felt that the book shed light on the negative consequences of television's dominance and encouraged critical thinking about its influence on our lives.

4. Lack of Updated Information: Some readers criticized the book for focusing on outdated examples and technology since its initial publication in 1997. They believed that Sartori's analysis failed to consider the rapid evolution of media and technology in recent years. These reviewers felt that an updated edition would have made the book more relevant and compelling.

HomoVidens BooksArePower ReadingCommunity