Keeping Track by Jeannie Oakes is an engrossing and thought-provoking exploration of the controversial practice of tracking in education. Oakes effectively argues that tracking perpetuates educational inequity and contributes to social inequalities. Throughout the book, she presents a wealth of case studies, research findings, and personal anecdotes to support her compelling argument.
A central focus of Oakes' argument is the disproportionately negative impact of tracking on marginalized communities. She emphasizes how students of color and those from low-income backgrounds are often relegated to lower tracks, which limits their access to challenging coursework and opportunities for academic advancement. This not only perpetuates the achievement gap but also reinforces social stratification.
Oakes also delves into the psychological consequences of tracking for students. She highlights how being labeled as "low-ability" can severely damage students' self-esteem and motivation. Moreover, she challenges the belief that grouping students by similar abilities enhances learning, noting that diverse classrooms and peer learning can be equally beneficial.
Available on Audible
Additionally, the author examines the role of tracking in perpetuating racial and socioeconomic segregation within schools. She contends that when students are segregated into different tracks based on perceived abilities, it deepens existing divisions and reinforces patterns of segregation. This segregation not only limits student interactions but also perpetuates unequal distribution of resources.
In summary, Keeping Track is a powerful and convincing critique of the tracking system in education. Jeannie Oakes presents a compelling case against tracking, advocating for educational reforms that promote equity and access for every student. This book is essential reading for educators, policymakers, and anyone interested in understanding the profound impact of tracking on students and society as a whole.
What are readers saying?
"Keeping Track" by author Jeannie Oakes has received a diverse range of reviews from readers. The book delves into the tracking system within American schools and how it contributes to educational inequality. While some reviewers commend Oakes for her insightful analysis and extensive research, others critique the book for its lack of depth and perceived bias.
Numerous readers appreciate Oakes' comprehensive research and critical evaluation of the tracking system. They find her arguments well-founded and convincing, applauding her for shedding light on the detrimental impact of tracking on marginalized students. These reviewers admire Oakes' passion and commitment to achieving educational equity, finding her work thought-provoking and enlightening.
However, there are readers who express disappointment with the book's limited focus and lack of depth. According to these reviewers, Oakes fails to provide concrete examples or solutions to the issues she brings up, leaving them wanting more practical guidance. They argue that the book heavily relies on theoretical frameworks, making it less accessible to a broader audience.
One recurring criticism of the book is its perceived bias. Some reviewers claim that Oakes presents a one-sided argument against tracking without adequately considering the potential benefits of the system. They argue that the author overlooks the fact that tracking can provide more challenging opportunities for high-achieving students and that her analysis lacks a balanced perspective on the issue.
Despite the criticisms, many readers applaud Oakes for her clear and articulate writing style. They find the book well-structured and easy to follow, which helps in understanding complex concepts and theories. Additionally, reviewers appreciate the extensive list of references and sources cited, which they believe enhances the book's credibility.
KeepingTrackBook BookRecommendation MustRead