La Narrativa Totalizadora de Jos� Mar�a Arguedas, Julio Ram�n Ribeyro Y Mario Vargas Llosa : Book Review

In the book "La Narrativa Totalizadora de José María Arguedas, Julio Ramón Ribeyro y Mario Vargas Llosa," author Carlos Schwalb explores the narrative styles and techniques utilized by three influential Peruvian writers: José María Arguedas, Julio Ramón Ribeyro, and Mario Vargas Llosa. Through an in-depth analysis of their literary works, Schwalb examines how these authors shape narratives that not only tell individual stories but also encompass broader social and historical contexts.

The book begins by examining José María Arguedas, who is renowned for his exploration of indigenous culture in Peru. Schwalb delves into Arguedas's unique narrative style, which combines Spanish and Quechua languages to capture the complexities of Peru's multicultural society. By closely analyzing key works such as "Yawar Fiesta" and "Los ríos profundos," Schwalb highlights Arguedas's ability to create a narrative that reflects the nation's social and cultural diversity.

The next focus is on Julio Ramón Ribeyro, a significant Peruvian writer known for his portrayal of the struggles faced by marginalized individuals. Schwalb delves into Ribeyro's collection of short stories, where he portrays characters from various social backgrounds to shed light on broader societal issues. Through an examination of works such as "La palabra del mudo" and "Alienación," Schwalb showcases Ribeyro's talent for crafting narratives that offer a multifaceted understanding of Peruvian society.

The final section of the book centers on Mario Vargas Llosa, an esteemed figure in Latin American literature. Schwalb explores Vargas Llosa's narrative strategies, particularly his incorporation of historical events and political themes. By analyzing works like "La ciudad y los perros" and "Conversación en la catedral," the author examines how Vargas Llosa weaves personal stories together with broader historical and social contexts, creating narratives that encapsulate the essence of Peru's tumultuous past.

Throughout "La Narrativa Totalizadora de José María Arguedas, Julio Ramón Ribeyro y Mario Vargas Llosa," Carlos Schwalb offers a comprehensive analysis of the narrative techniques employed by these three prominent Peruvian writers. By delving into their works, he highlights their ability to create narratives that encompass not only personal stories but also larger social and historical contexts. This book serves as a valuable resource for those interested in Peruvian literature and the broader themes explored within these narratives.

What are readers saying?

Carlos Schwalb's book, "La Narrativa Totalizadora de José María Arguedas, Julio Ramón Ribeyro y Mario Vargas Llosa," has received a mixed reception from readers. The book delves into the works of three renowned Peruvian authors and explores their contributions to totalizing narrative techniques.

Some readers found Schwalb's analysis and insights to be enlightening and thought-provoking. They appreciated the deep exploration of the narrative techniques employed by Arguedas, Ribeyro, and Vargas Llosa, and how these techniques intertwined with the overall themes and structures of their works. These readers considered the book to be a valuable resource for gaining a deeper understanding of the authors' writing styles and storytelling approaches.

However, other reviewers felt that the book was overly academic and excessively focused on literary theory. The dense and theoretical nature of the content made it challenging for them to connect with it. These readers were hoping for a more accessible and reader-friendly analysis of the authors' works.

Furthermore, some reviewers noted deficiencies in editing and organization within the book. They found it difficult to follow the flow of arguments and believed that better structuring would have enhanced the book's readability and comprehension.

Additionally, a few readers expressed disappointment with the lack of critical analysis and the repetitive nature of the book. They felt that the author failed to offer enough original insights or new perspectives on the works of Arguedas, Ribeyro, and Vargas Llosa, and that much of the content regurgitated information already available in other literary critiques.

JoséMaríaArguedas JulioRamónRibeyro MarioVargasLlosa