Living High and Letting Die: Our Illusion of Innocence : Book Review

In his thought-provoking book, "Living High and Letting Die," Peter K. Unger delves into the moral dimensions of our personal choices and responsibilities in the face of widespread poverty and suffering. He challenges our conventional thinking by presenting vivid examples and philosophical arguments that compel us to question how we prioritize our own well-being over the lives of others in dire need.

Unger begins by examining the moral implications of our daily choices, such as indulging in luxury spending or taking extravagant vacations, when we could use that money to save lives. He starkly contrasts our comfortable lifestyles with the extreme poverty experienced by millions worldwide. Through powerful real-life scenarios, Unger effectively brings the ethical dilemma into focus, compelling us to confront our own complicity.

One key argument Unger puts forth is the concept of "distance" as a moral barrier. He argues that despite being geographically distant from those in need, our moral obligation to help remains unchanged. Unger challenges us to expand our circle of ethical concern beyond our immediate surroundings and take responsibility for the well-being of strangers far away.

Another compelling aspect of Unger's book is his exploration of the role of institutions and governments in addressing poverty. He contends that collective action and policy changes are necessary to tackle the systemic issues that perpetuate poverty. Unger convincingly argues that structural changes are crucial for distributing resources more equitably and fostering a more just society.

Overall, Peter K. Unger's "Living High and Letting Die" is an illuminating and thought-provoking exploration of the moral responsibilities we bear in a world riddled with poverty. By challenging conventional thinking and presenting compelling arguments, Unger prompts us to reassess our individual choices and their impact on global suffering. This book serves as a poignant reminder to prioritize compassion and empathy in our decision-making process, delivering a powerful call to action for a more equitable and just world.

What are readers saying?

"Living High and Letting Die" by Peter K. Unger has received a range of opinions from readers, with some appreciating the book's stimulating and thought-provoking concepts, while others find flaws in the author's arguments that make them impractical.

Many reviewers commend Unger for challenging readers to question their moral responsibility towards those in dire need. The book delves into the ethics of giving and explores the moral implications of choosing not to help others. These discussions are widely seen as intellectually stimulating, and Unger is praised for delving deep into complex philosophical ideas.

However, some reviewers argue that the book's theoretical approach lacks practicality and fails to account for the real-life complexities and constraints of charitable giving. They suggest that Unger's proposed moral obligations are unrealistic and do not apply to practical scenarios.

Another criticism among reviewers is the repetition found in the book. Some readers feel that Unger tends to reiterate his ideas and arguments, which detracts from the overall impact of his message and can make the reading experience redundant and monotonous. This repetition often leads readers to lose interest.

On a positive note, many readers appreciate the nuanced and thought-provoking examples provided by Unger to illustrate ethical dilemmas. These examples help to make the book's abstract concepts relatable, enabling readers to better understand and engage with the moral quandaries presented.

LivingHighAndLettingDie EthicalDilemmas PhilosophicalDebates