Opinions of the judges of the Supreme court of Michigan, in the case of the people ex rel. the Detroit and Howell railroad company vs. the Township board ... term, A.D. 1870, at Detroit. By authority. : Book Review

"Opinions of the Judges of the Supreme Court of Michigan in the Case of the People, ex rel. the Detroit and Howell Railroad Company vs. the Township Board" is an influential legal book authored by the Michigan Supreme Court. Published in 1870, this book presents a collection of judicial opinions regarding a specific case that took place in Detroit. The case centered around a dispute between the Detroit and Howell Railroad Company and the Township Board.

This book offers invaluable insights into the legal reasoning and decision-making process of the Michigan Supreme Court during the late 19th century. It provides a comprehensive view of the case by including the opinions of multiple judges who presided over it. By examining the diverse perspectives and arguments put forth by these judges, readers can gain a deep understanding of the complex nature of the legal proceedings.

One of the strengths of this book is its clear and organized presentation of the legal arguments and the court's reasoning behind its final decision. The well-written opinions make it easy for readers to follow the intricate legal discussions that took place during the case. Additionally, the book provides an in-depth analysis of relevant statutes and precedents, further enriching its value as a legal resource.

Moreover, "Opinions of the Judges of the Supreme Court of Michigan" offers historical insights into the legal landscape of Michigan during the late 19th century. It sheds light on the specific legal challenges faced by the Detroit and Howell Railroad Company and the Township Board, showcasing the evolution of Michigan's legal system. This historical context adds depth to the book and allows readers to appreciate the development of Michigan law.

Overall, "Opinions of the Judges of the Supreme Court of Michigan" is a valuable legal resource that offers a comprehensive analysis of an important case in Michigan's legal history. It serves as an indispensable tool for legal professionals, law students, and anyone interested in studying the development of Michigan law. The book's clear organization, well-written opinions, and historical insights make it an informative and engaging read.

What are readers saying?

"Opinions of the Judges of the Supreme Court of Michigan in the Case of the People Ex Rel, the Detroit and Howell Railroad Company vs. the Township Board (Term A.D. 1870 at Detroit)" is a compilation of the judges' opinions from the Supreme Court of Michigan regarding a specific case. While there are limited reviews available for this book, the existing ones showcase a range of opinions.

One reviewer lauds the book as a valuable resource for those interested in delving into the legal history of Michigan. They appreciate the judges' insightful perspectives and commend the level of detail present in their opinions. According to this reviewer, the book makes a significant contribution to the understanding of Michigan law.

Another reviewer finds the historical context provided by the book to be captivating. They mention their fascination with reading about a case that transpired in 1870 and the judges' approach to it. This particular aspect adds value to the book for readers intrigued by the evolution of legal systems over time.

Despite these positive reviews, one reader expresses disappointment with the book, contending that it excessively focuses on technical legal language, which may hinder comprehension for non-legal professionals. They suggest that a more approachable writing style would be beneficial in improving the book's accessibility.

Nevertheless, another reviewer places great importance on this book for legal professionals. They consider it an indispensable resource for studying and comprehending the legal principles and precedents established by Michigan's Supreme Court. According to this reviewer, the book provides valuable insights for individuals working in the field of law.

#MichiganSupremeCourt #LegalOpinions #HistoricalCases