Philosophers on Education: New Historical Perspectives : Book Review

"Philosophers on Education" by Amélie Oksenberg Rorty offers a comprehensive exploration of the philosophical underpinnings of education. The book brings together the perspectives of influential philosophers like Plato, Rousseau, Dewey, and Wittgenstein, providing readers with a diverse range of ideas and theories.

One of the standout features of the book is its emphasis on diversity. Rorty includes a wide array of philosophical approaches to education, both classical and contemporary, enabling readers to gain a rich understanding of the subject. This multiplicity of voices allows for a nuanced exploration of key questions regarding education, such as its purpose, the nature of knowledge, and the role of teachers.

The organization and presentation of the essays in the book are another strength. Rorty provides concise introductions to each philosopher's work, which helps create a historical context and highlights the main themes. This makes the complex theories and concepts more accessible to a wide range of readers, whether they are scholars or simply interested in the topic of education.

Moreover, "Philosophers on Education" not only delves into theoretical aspects but also connects them to practical implications. The essays explore how philosophical ideas can be applied in educational settings, shedding light on issues like curriculum development, teaching methodologies, and the cultivation of critical thinking skills. This practical approach enhances the relevance of the book for educators, policymakers, and anyone interested in the field of education.

In conclusion, "Philosophers on Education" is a thought-provoking and illuminating collection that offers valuable insights into the fundamental principles of education. Rorty's careful selection of philosophers and her clear presentation make this book a compelling read, stimulating reflection and encouraging further dialogue on the nature and purpose of education. Whether you are a professional in the field or simply curious about the topic, this book provides a rich and diverse exploration of the philosophical foundations of education.

What are readers saying?

"Philosophers on Education" by Amélie Oksenberg Rorty has garnered a range of responses from readers. Many readers praised the book for its valuable content, which includes an assortment of philosophical perspectives on education. They applauded Rorty for compiling essays from renowned philosophers such as Plato, Rousseau, Dewey, and Wittgenstein. Readers found these writings to be insightful and thought-provoking as they offered diverse viewpoints on the purpose and methods of education. They appreciated the book's depth and considered it a comprehensive resource for anyone interested in the philosophy of education.

However, some readers found the book challenging to read and felt that the essays were excessively dense and abstract. They noted that the content might be too advanced for readers with limited knowledge of philosophy. Additionally, a few readers felt that the book lacked coherence as it presented the essays in a disorganized manner, making it difficult to follow the arguments and connect the ideas presented by the different philosophers.

Another criticism expressed by some readers was the book's focus on Western philosophers, neglecting representation from non-Western thinkers. They believed that this limitation hindered the perspective and depth of the education discussion. Furthermore, readers who sought practical applications of philosophy in education found the book lacking in this regard. They desired more concrete examples and case studies to demonstrate how these philosophical perspectives could be applied in educational settings.

Overall, "Philosophers on Education" received positive reviews from those who appreciated the book's comprehensive collection of essays and its ability to stimulate deep contemplation. However, readers who found the content challenging or sought a more practical approach to philosophy in education were less satisfied. Despite its limitations, the book remains a valuable resource for those interested in exploring different philosophical viewpoints on education.