"Rethinking Risk Assessment" presents a fresh perspective on the current methods of risk assessment in the criminal justice system. John Monahan, a renowned expert in the field, offers innovative alternatives to improve the reliability and fairness of risk assessments.
In this insightful book, Monahan challenges the traditional approaches of relying solely on actuarial risk assessment tools. He argues that these tools often produce biased and inaccurate results and delves into the inherent limitations and biases of commonly used algorithms. Monahan proposes a more individualized, evidence-based approach that takes into account dynamic factors such as age, mental health, and social circumstances.
One of the key points Monahan makes is regarding the ethical implications of risk assessment. He emphasizes the potential for unfair treatment and discrimination, and advocates for the incorporation of principles of fairness, transparency, and accountability into the risk assessment process. By doing so, the protection of individuals' rights can be ensured and societal justice can be upheld.
Available on Audible
Additionally, Monahan goes beyond critique and offers practical suggestions for implementing reform in risk assessment practices. He outlines specific steps for developing more accurate and equitable assessment tools, highlighting the importance of collaboration between researchers, policymakers, and practitioners.
Overall, "Rethinking Risk Assessment" is a thought-provoking and timely contribution to the field of criminal justice. Monahan's expertise and compelling arguments challenge readers to reconsider long-standing assumptions and actively work towards a more effective and just system of risk assessment. By taking into account dynamic factors and incorporating principles of fairness, transparency, and accountability, the criminal justice system can be improved to better serve individuals and society as a whole.
What are readers saying?
The book "Rethinking Risk Assessment" by John Monahan has received a range of reviews from readers. While some found the book to be informative and thought-provoking, others believed it lacked depth and failed to provide practical solutions. Overall, it seems that opinions on the book are divided.
Among the positive reviews, a common theme is the fresh perspective that Monahan offers on risk assessment. Many readers appreciated his insights into the limitations of current methods and his exploration of alternative approaches. They found his arguments to be well-supported and intellectually stimulating, which prompted them to question their own preconceived notions about risk assessment.
On the other hand, negative reviews often mentioned the book's lack of practicality. Some readers felt that although Monahan raised important concerns, he failed to offer concrete solutions or suggestions for improvement. This left them feeling frustrated and desiring more actionable takeaways from the book. In addition, the dense and academic writing style was criticized for making it difficult to engage with the content.
Another recurring criticism was the repetitive nature of the book. Some reviewers felt that Monahan reiterated the same points throughout, resulting in a lack of progression and a sense of redundancy. This led to disappointment as they were expecting more diverse insights and a deeper exploration of the topic.
Despite these criticisms, many readers acknowledged the value of Monahan's perspective. They found the book to be a valuable starting point for further exploration and discussion on risk assessment. Several reviewers expressed appreciation for the challenging questions raised by Monahan, even if they did not necessarily agree with all of his conclusions.
RethinkingRiskAssessment BookLovers ReadingRecommendation