"The Constitution in Exile" by Andrew P. Napolitano is an insightful and thought-provoking book that challenges the prevailing understanding and interpretation of the United States Constitution. Napolitano contends that the Constitution has been relegated to the sidelines, as its principles have been eroded and government power has expanded. With a combination of historical events and legal cases, Napolitano presents a compelling argument for the restoration of constitutional principles.
The book opens with the story of Roger Sherman Baldwin, a prominent lawyer who defended escaped slaves in the famous Amistad case. From this example, Napolitano asserts that the Constitution was designed to safeguard individual liberties and limit government interference, irrespective of popular sentiment. He proceeds to delve into the history of the Supreme Court, analyzing landmark cases that have shaped constitutional interpretation.
Throughout the book, Napolitano emphasizes the significance of the Bill of Rights and its role in protecting individual freedoms. He questions the idea of a "living constitution" that evolves over time and calls for a strict adherence to the original intent of the framers. Napolitano also tackles contentious topics such as executive power, privacy rights, and the judiciary's role in upholding constitutional principles.
Available on Audible
"The Constitution in Exile" is a well-researched and passionately argued book that will captivate individuals interested in constitutional law and political philosophy. Napolitano's writing is lucid and accessible, making complex legal concepts easily comprehensible to a general audience. While his viewpoints may be contentious to some, this book offers a thought-provoking perspective on the present state of constitutional interpretation and raises critical questions about the role of government in a free society.
Ultimately, "The Constitution in Exile" makes a valuable contribution to the ongoing debate on constitutional principles and their relevance in contemporary times. It serves as a reminder of the importance of preserving and upholding the fundamental ideals of the Constitution. Whether one agrees with all of Napolitano's arguments or not, this book encourages readers to reflect on the principles that underpin the American political system and consider the implications of their erosion.
What are readers saying?
"The Constitution in Exile" by Andrew P. Napolitano garnered a diverse range of reviews from readers. While some praised the author's understanding of constitutional law and his ability to present complex concepts in a digestible manner, others criticized the book for its apparent bias and lack of objectivity.
Those who enjoyed the book commended Napolitano for his deep knowledge of the Constitution and his emphasis on individual liberties and limited government. They appreciated his exploration of instances where the government overstepped constitutional boundaries. However, detractors argued that Napolitano's political biases overshadowed the objective analysis of the Constitution. They felt that his conservative viewpoint and criticisms of certain government actions compromised the book's impartiality. Some readers also felt that Napolitano's arguments lacked nuance and failed to consider alternative perspectives.
A common critique among reviewers was the book's perceived lack of balance. Some readers believed that Napolitano's interpretation of the Constitution was too narrow, neglecting the evolving nature of constitutional law. They also felt that his arguments lacked essential supporting evidence and were often oversimplified.
Despite the divided opinions, numerous readers appreciated "The Constitution in Exile" for its thought-provoking nature and ability to stimulate discussions on constitutional principles and the government's role. Many praised the book's clear and engaging writing style, making it accessible to readers with varying levels of familiarity with constitutional law and politics.
Overall, Andrew P. Napolitano's "The Constitution in Exile" garnered both praise and criticism from readers. While some valued the author's insights and writing style, others found fault with what they perceived as a biased and lacking objectivity in his analysis of the Constitution.
ConstitutionInExile AmericanHistory LegalScholarship