"The Formal Basis of Modern Architecture" is a dissertation written by Peter Eisenman in 1963. Recently reissued as a facsimile, this book offers a comprehensive exploration of the evolution of modern architecture, analyzing different architectural elements and their formal relationships. Eisenman's dissertation is groundbreaking because it challenges the prevailing theories of architectural design from that time and proposes a new approach based on linguistic theory.
Broken down into four major sections, the book delves into various aspects of architectural form. Eisenman takes an in-depth look at symmetry, geometric composition, and order, providing insight into the underlying principles that govern modern architectural design. Throughout the book, he draws inspiration from the works of influential architects such as Le Corbusier and Ludwig Mies van der Rohe, thoroughly analyzing their techniques to develop his own formal framework.
One of the most significant contributions of this book is Eisenman's introduction of linguistic theory into architectural discourse. He argues that architectural form can be understood as a system of signs and symbols, much like language, and can be deconstructed and analyzed using similar methods. This unique perspective challenges traditional notions of architecture and opens the door to a fresh understanding of its fundamental principles.
Available on Audible
Eisenman's writing style is highly intellectual and thought-provoking. He presents his ideas in a clear and systematic manner, offering both theoretical explanations and practical examples. Although the content can be complex at times, the facsimile edition retains the original formatting and diagrams from the dissertation, allowing readers to fully grasp the text in its original context and enhancing their understanding.
In summary, "The Formal Basis of Modern Architecture" is a seminal work that delves into the heart of modern architecture through a meticulous analysis of architectural form. Eisenman's utilization of linguistic theory and his detailed examination of various architectural elements make this book a valuable resource for architects, students, and anyone passionate about comprehending the underlying principles that govern modern architectural design.
What are readers saying?
"The Formal Basis of Modern Architecture: Dissertation 1963" by Peter Eisenman has received a range of reviews, expressing both admiration and dissatisfaction. The book, a facsimile of Eisenman's dissertation, delves into the formal and theoretical aspects of modern architecture. Let's take a closer look at the reviews:
Some readers appreciated the book for its comprehensive exploration of modern architecture's formal elements. They commended Eisenman for his meticulous analysis and his ability to connect architectural theory with historical context. These readers found the book to be a valuable resource for architecture students and professionals seeking a deeper understanding of the subject matter.
On the other hand, some reviewers expressed disappointment with the book. They critiqued Eisenman's writing style, describing it as overly academic and challenging to follow. These readers believed that the book lacked clarity and coherence, making it inaccessible to a general audience. Additionally, they mentioned the heavy reliance on complex diagrams and illustrations, further hindering comprehension.
Many reviewers emphasized the significance of the book in understanding the development of modern architecture. They praised Eisenman's contributions to the field, highlighting how his dissertation laid the foundation for his influential ideas and architectural projects. However, some readers felt that the book's relevance might be limited to those with a specific interest or background in architectural theory.
Several reviewers appreciated the book's focus on the formal aspects of architecture, such as geometry and symmetry. They found Eisenman's structural analysis to be thought-provoking and inspiring. However, others felt that the book lacked practical applications or failed to address the broader context of architectural practice.
ModernArchitectureDissertation FormalBasis 1963Facsimile