In Terry Eagleton's "The Function of Criticism," the importance and purpose of literary criticism are thoroughly explored and analyzed. Eagleton delves into various facets of this field, discussing its relationship with literature, philosophy, and ideology. He contends that criticism should not simply involve evaluating or judging literary works, but should also engage with their socio-political and cultural contexts.
Eagleton vehemently argues against the notion of criticism being detached from the practice of reading and writing. To truly grasp the intricacies and subtleties of literary texts, he asserts that close reading and interpretation are essential. Criticism should not be seen as separate from the creative process itself, but rather as an integral part of it.
One of the central concepts examined in the book is the influence of ideology on literary criticism. Eagleton suggests that critics' interpretations of literature are shaped by their ideologies. He emphasizes the necessity for critics to be self-aware and critical of their own biases in order to provide a more impartial and insightful analysis.
Available on Audible
Additionally, Eagleton explores the relationship between criticism and society. He posits that criticism has the potential to challenge and shape cultural norms and values. By engaging with literature and critically examining its social implications, critics can contribute to broader societal discussions and facilitate positive change.
Overall, "The Function of Criticism" offers a comprehensive and thought-provoking perspective on the significance and function of literary criticism. Eagleton's arguments encourage readers to perceive criticism as an intellectual pursuit that surpasses mere opinion or evaluation. This thought-provoking book will appeal to scholars, students, and individuals interested in comprehending how criticism plays a pivotal role in our comprehension of literature and society.
What are readers saying?
"The Function of Criticism" by Terry Eagleton has garnered a variety of responses from readers. Generally speaking, the reviews highlight Eagleton's perceptive analysis of the purpose and significance of criticism. However, some readers have criticized the book for its excessively theoretical nature, finding it challenging to understand.
Many reviewers commend Eagleton for his intellectual depth and his ability to dissect and analyze various elements of criticism. They appreciate his exploration of the historical and cultural contexts within which different forms of criticism have emerged. Several readers note that the book provides a fresh perspective on the purpose of criticism, pushing beyond its traditional role of merely evaluating works of art.
Conversely, some readers find Eagleton's writing style to be complex and inaccessible. They argue that the book relies heavily on academic jargon, making it less accessible to a broader audience. These reviewers feel that Eagleton's arguments could have been presented in a more straightforward and engaging manner.
A recurring theme in the reviews is Eagleton's examination of the relationship between criticism and power. Some readers appreciate his insights into how criticism can be used to both maintain and challenge power structures within society. They find his discussions on the politics of criticism to be thought-provoking and pertinent.
However, there are also readers who feel that Eagleton's analysis is excessively focused on Marxist and post-structuralist theories, neglecting other perspectives. They argue that the book lacks a balanced exploration of different theories and approaches to criticism.
BookReview LiteraryCriticism ClassicLiterature