In "The Rhetoric of Economics" by Deirdre Nansen McCloskey, she delves into the often-overlooked aspect of rhetoric in the field of economics. McCloskey argues that how economists communicate their ideas significantly impacts the credibility and effectiveness of their work.
McCloskey places great emphasis on the importance of clear and persuasive language in economic discourse. According to her, economists must move beyond dry technical jargon and adopt a more engaging writing style that can effectively communicate their ideas to both experts and the general public. By delving into the historical development of economic rhetoric, McCloskey demonstrates how language has shaped economic theories and policies over time.
The book takes a critical approach towards the prevalent use of mathematical and statistical models in economics. McCloskey asserts that, while these tools have their place, they should not overshadow the power of rhetoric in the field. She argues that economists should be more mindful of the narratives they construct and the persuasive techniques they employ, as these elements have a profound impact on how their work is received and interpreted.
Available on Audible
McCloskey provides numerous case studies and examples from the history of economics to support her argument. By examining these illustrations, she prompts readers to reflect on the influence of language in shaping economic discourse and policy debates. Additionally, she encourages economists to embrace a more interdisciplinary approach and engage with other social sciences to enhance the persuasive power of their arguments.
Overall, "The Rhetoric of Economics" challenges economists to rethink how they communicate their ideas. McCloskey's emphasis on the power of persuasive language and careful storytelling provides a fresh perspective on the field of economics, highlighting the need for greater attention to rhetoric in economic discourse.
What are readers saying?
"The Rhetoric of Economics" by Deirdre Nansen McCloskey has garnered mixed reviews from readers. While some found the book to be insightful and thought-provoking, others believed it lacked depth and was overly complex.
Many readers praised McCloskey's ability to challenge conventional economic narratives and emphasize the importance of rhetoric in the field. They appreciated her exploration of how language can shape economic theories and policies, finding it to be a fresh perspective on the subject.
However, there were readers who found McCloskey's arguments convoluted and the writing style dense, hindering their understanding and engagement. They felt that the book would have benefited from a more accessible and concise presentation.
Some readers also mentioned that the book lacked depth and failed to provide adequate evidence or examples to support its arguments. They felt that McCloskey's points were not sufficiently substantiated, leaving them unsatisfied with the overall content.
Despite these criticisms, many readers appreciated McCloskey's unique perspective and found her ideas stimulating. They valued the book's exploration of the role of rhetoric in shaping economic discourse and its potential implications. They believed that, although the book had its shortcomings, it made a valuable contribution to the field.
TheRhetoricOfEconomics EconomicPersuasion CriticalThinkingInEconomics