The Tempting of America: The Political Seduction of the Law : Book Review

"The Tempting of America" by Robert H. Bork offers an insightful analysis of the American legal system and its influence on society. Bork, a prominent conservative legal scholar, delves into topics such as judicial activism, originalism, and the Constitution, arguing that the Supreme Court has increasingly become a political institution rather than adhering to the Constitution's original intent.

Bork provides a comprehensive examination of how the Court's decisions have shaped social issues such as abortion, affirmative action, and freedom of speech. He believes that the Court's activist approach undermines the democratic process, as it removes decision-making power from the people and places it in the hands of unelected judges. Bork also criticizes the Court's tendency to interpret the Constitution based on contemporary societal values rather than the framers' intentions.

Central to the book is Bork's call for a return to originalism, the belief that the Constitution should be interpreted according to its original meaning and intent. He argues that departing from this approach has led to a dangerous expansion of judicial power. Bork's insights on the importance of judicial restraint and the limitations of the Court's role in shaping public policy make for engaging reading, particularly for those interested in legal and political theory.

"The Tempting of America" presents a forceful critique of the Supreme Court's influence on American society and emphasizes the risks of judges exceeding their constitutional authority. While Bork's conservative perspective may not resonate with all readers, his well-reasoned arguments and extensive legal knowledge contribute meaningfully to the ongoing debate on the judiciary's role in the United States. Whether readers agree with his viewpoint or not, Bork's work challenges them to critically assess the impact of judicial decision-making on individual rights and democratic governance.

"The Tempting of America" by Robert H. Bork is an engaging and thought-provoking exploration of the American judicial system. The book has received mostly positive reviews, with readers appreciating the author's insightful analysis and his conservative viewpoint on legal matters.

Many reviewers applaud Bork's extensive research and deep understanding of constitutional law. His ability to present complex concepts in a clear and accessible manner is highly praised, making the book suitable for a wide range of readers. Bork's extensive knowledge on the subject matter strengthens his arguments and adds credibility to his perspective.

Several readers also commend Bork for his conservative stance and his willingness to challenge dominant liberal interpretations of the Constitution. He raises significant questions about the role of judges in shaping public policy and cautions against the potential dangers of judicial activism. Readers who share his conservative values appreciate his emphasis on adhering to the original intent of the Constitution.

However, some reviewers express concerns about the book's one-sidedness and Bork's tendency to overly criticize liberal approaches to jurisprudence. They argue that his analysis lacks nuance and oversimplifies complex legal issues. Additionally, some take issue with Bork's dismissal of certain civil rights advancements, suggesting that his conservative perspective limits his understanding of social progress.

Although many readers value Bork's insights, a few find his writing style dense and scholarly, which may pose a challenge for casual readers without a strong background in legal matters. Nonetheless, those with a keen interest in law and politics find "The Tempting of America" to be a stimulating and thought-provoking read.

TheTemptingOfAmerica ConstitutionalDebate LegalSystem