What Does the Internment of Japanese Americans Mean? : Book Review

"What Does the Internment of Japanese Americans Mean?" by Alice Yang Murray provides a thorough and thought-provoking examination of the internment camps that were established during World War II. This book explores the historical context surrounding the internment, the experiences of Japanese Americans during this period, and the lasting impact it had on individuals and the nation as a whole.

Murray offers a well-balanced and meticulous analysis of the political, social, and economic factors that contributed to the decision to intern thousands of Japanese Americans. She shines a light on the fear and prejudice that led to this policy, emphasizing the tension between national security and civil liberties. Through extensive research, Murray exposes the flawed reasoning and discriminatory practices that underpinned the internment.

A notable strength of this book is Murray's ability to humanize the individuals affected by internment. She shares personal narratives and firsthand accounts, giving voice to those who endured the trauma of being forcibly removed from their homes and uprooted from their lives. These stories create a powerful and emotional connection to the individuals and families impacted by these unjust actions.

Additionally, Murray examines the aftermath of internment and the ongoing challenges faced by the Japanese American community. She discusses the efforts for redress and reparations, as well as how this dark episode in American history continues to shape modern-day discussions on racism, civil rights, and national identity.

Murray's writing is accessible and engaging throughout the book, making it a valuable resource for both scholars and general readers. Her meticulous research and nuanced analysis make "What Does the Internment of Japanese Americans Mean?" an essential read for anyone seeking a deeper understanding of the internment camps and their significance in shaping American history.

What are readers saying?

The book "What Does the Internment of Japanese Americans Mean?" written by Alice Yang Murray has garnered a range of responses from readers. Numerous individuals found the book to be a valuable and comprehensive resource, praising its ability to shed light on the internment of Japanese Americans during World War II. They commended the author for providing a wealth of historical context, unraveling the factors that contributed to the internment and exploring its impact on the affected community. Furthermore, readers lauded the extensive research conducted by the author and the inclusion of personal testimonies, which brought a human element to the narrative.

However, some readers expressed concerns regarding the book's lack of focus. They felt that the level of detail provided was excessive and occasionally overwhelming. They believed that the author could have organized the content more effectively and delved deeper into the broader implications of the internment. Furthermore, a number of reviewers criticized the book's academic and dry writing style, claiming it made the text less accessible to a general audience.

Opinions on the book's objectivity varied among readers. Several individuals applauded the author for presenting a balanced and unbiased account of the internment, acknowledging its controversial nature. They appreciated the inclusion of diverse perspectives and the author's efforts to provide a nuanced understanding of the events. However, other readers believed that the author's bias was apparent throughout the narrative, particularly in her portrayal of the American government's role. They felt that the book leaned more towards a critical stance rather than offering a neutral analysis.

In summary, "What Does the Internment of Japanese Americans Mean?" was well received for its extensively researched and informative nature. Nonetheless, some readers felt that improvements could have been made to enhance the book's organizational structure and writing style, making it more readable. Additionally, opinions on the book's objectivity were divided, with some praising its balance and others perceiving a bias towards a specific viewpoint.