When Did Ignorance Become a Point of View? : Book Review

"When Did Ignorance Become a Point of View?" is a thought-provoking book by Scott Adams, the well-known creator of the "Dilbert" comic strip. In this book, Adams encourages readers to question their beliefs and challenge conventional wisdom.

Adams explores the idea that ignorance can sometimes be a valid perspective. He argues that being uninformed doesn't necessarily mean one is wrong. In fact, it can often lead to creative thinking and fresh ideas. He urges readers to embrace uncertainty and to scrutinize the assumptions that underpin their beliefs.

The power of persuasion is a central theme in the book. Adams delves into the techniques used by politicians, marketers, and even con artists to sway people's opinions. It's crucial to be aware of these tactics and develop skeptical thinking skills to avoid being easily influenced.

Cognitive biases, another topic Adams covers, highlight the ways in which our minds can deceive us into believing things that may not be true. By understanding and recognizing these biases, readers can become better at critically evaluating information and making informed decisions.

What sets this book apart is Adams' engaging and humorous writing style. He presents his ideas in an accessible manner, making complex concepts easier to understand for a wide range of readers. Adams challenges readers’ preconceived notions, encouraging them to think more critically about the world around them.

What are readers saying?

Scott Adams' book, "When Did Ignorance Become a Point of View?" has received a range of reviews from readers, with opinions varying widely. Overall, the book seems to provoke a mixed response.

Some readers highly praise Adams' perspectives and insights, appreciating his ability to challenge conventional wisdom and present thought-provoking ideas. They find the book engaging and eye-opening, allowing them to gain new perspectives on various topics. Adams' humor, wit, and ability to dissect complex issues with simplicity are also commended.

However, there are readers who found the book underwhelming. They express disappointment with the lack of depth in the author's arguments and suggest that the book is more suitable for entertainment rather than serious analysis. Some readers find Adams' writing self-righteous and close-minded, with little room for opposing viewpoints.

Several reviews mention that the title of the book might be misleading, as the content didn't fully address the main theme. This led to dissatisfaction among readers who were seeking a more focused discussion on the topic.

Some readers comment on the book's structure and writing style. A few find the organization and flow of the book to be disjointed, hindering their reading experience. However, others mention that Adams' conversational tone makes the book feel more approachable and accessible for a wider audience.

IgnoranceIsNotOpinion KnowledgeIsPower ExpandYourPerspective